The Buddhist teachings offer two main approaches appropriate
to the needs of different individuals. The Hinayana approach,
known as the lesser vehicle, concerns the teachings regarding
achieving individual liberation, and the Mahayana, known
as the greater vehicle, concerns the pursuit of the greater
approach of achieving liberation for the sake of all beings.
Here we are concerned with the Mahayana, and the cornerstone
of this approach which is developing the four immeasurable
attitudes of love, compassion, joy, and equanimity. Rather
than simply being confined to topics discussed in the teachings,
these are specific and direct methods we as individuals can
use to gain liberation in this greater context of Mahayana,
known as the bodhisattva path.
These immeasurable attitudes and the teachings concerning
them are not only the province of Buddhist teachings;
they are in the public domain. They are valid for all
of us, whether
we are practicing Buddhists or non-Buddhists, whether
we are spiritual or completely worldly. They are qualities
that
really matter, and they make an enormous and positive
difference in all our lives, regardless of our orientation.
According to the Buddhist view, what essentially
do we mean by love, by compassion, by joy, and by equanimity?
To begin
to answer this, we need to consider how these terms
are used, and what they signify.
Love is defined in these teachings as the heartfelt
wish that another being enjoy happiness and the fruits
of happiness,
and that they be endowed with the causes of future
happiness. Compassion refers to the heartfelt desire
that another being
be free from suffering in the present moment; that
they will not generate the causes for future suffering;
and that they
will be free from any future suffering. Joy is the
joyful, sympathetic response from the heart of one
being who perceives
another being who is both free from suffering and enjoying
happiness. Equanimity, the fourth immeasurable, is
the quality of mind that is completely without bias
and equally responsive
to all situations, without the usual prejudices of
attachment, aversion, and ignorance to which we are
so often subject.
All these qualities can be considered from two points
of view, a more mundane or worldly context, and a transcendent
context that goes beyond what is simply of this world.
From
the perspective of the buddhas, these two possibilities
or viewpoints exist based upon the kind of attitude
or scope
with which we feel these responses of love, compassion,
joy, and equanimity towards others.When speaking about
love, we are not referring to something foreign to any
of us. We all know what it is like to
love, even though we tend to reserve that love for
those close
to us-for example, those we find attractive or those
with whom we have an emotional connection, such as
parent or child.
In this manner we tailor the way in which we feel our
love. The same holds true for the other three qualities
of compassion,
joy, and equanimity.
As we apply the four qualities of love, compassion,
joy, and equanimity on the purely mundane level to
this life,
and this world, without any thought or scope beyond
that, the rewards they bring are something we ourselves
also experience
within our present lives and within this world. In
this way, these four attitudes definitely do lead us
to the experience
of greater peace, contentment, and satisfaction.When
as individuals we feel any kind of altruism, any sense
of concern for the well-being of another, however
limited
or biased it may be, there is benefit, both in the
short term and in the long term. For the short term,
the benefit
of altruism is the greater individual degree of satisfaction
these limited or measurable qualities bring to our
own lives. For the long term, the benefit these qualities
lead us to
is a greater sense of happiness and the achievement
of a higher state of rebirth.
However, it is important to make the distinction between
the limited and the immeasurable aspects of these attitudes.
If we experience love towards one or two individuals,
or a group of individuals, or perhaps a whole nation
of individuals,
then as valid as that love is, it has definite limits
and boundaries, and is measurable.This more limited
sense of love is not wrong or something to be avoided or
discouraged; it is quite the opposite.
Although such love may be biased because it is felt
only towards some
individuals and groups and not others, that in no way
robs it of its value. Whether these feelings of love,
compassion,
joy, and equanimity are felt between husband and wife,
parent and child, brother and sister, members of a
community, or
members of a whole nation, they nevertheless contribute
enormously to our happiness and well-being. So by calling
this sense
of love limited, I am not meaning to downplay or discount
it at all. Again, we must come to understand the distinction
between the two ways of perceiving these qualities. More